Works of Feyerabend

A complete bibliography of  of Feyerabend’s written work can be found on Matteo Collodels’s website.

Monographs

• Feyerabend, P. K. 1975. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: New Left Books.
  Fourth edition (with an introduction of Ian Hacking) London and New York: Verso, 2010.
• Feyerabend, P. K. 1978. Science in a Free Society. London; New York: New Left Books [London: Verso, 1982].
• Feyerabend, P. K. 1979. Erkenntnis für Freie Menschen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Significantly different German translation of Science in a Free Society).
• Feyerabend, P. K. 1991. Three Dialogues on Knowledge. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Feyerabend, P. K. 1995. Killing Time: The Autobiography of Paul Feyerabend. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
• Feyerabend, P. K. 2009. Naturphilosophie. (H. Heit & E. Oberheim, eds.) Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
• Feyerabend, P. K. 1999. The Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction versus the Richness of Being. (B. Terpstra, Ed.). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (unfinished manuscript).
• Feyerabend, P. K. 2011. The Tyranny of Science. (E. Oberheim, ed.) Cambridge: Polity.

Reviews of Science in a Free Society

• Koertge, N. 1980. Review of Paul Feyerabend, Science in a Free Society.  Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21, pp. 385–90.
• Schlagel, R.H. 1981. Review of Science in a Free Society.  Review of Metaphysics 35, pp. 383-385.
  
• Dunlap, T.R. 1984. Review of Paul Feyerabend, Science in a Free Society. ISIS 75(1), pp. 211-212.
  
• Dupré, J. 1994. Review of Paul Feyerabend, Science in a Free Society. Stanford Magazine, pp. 12–13.

Secondary Literature

Collected Works

• Munévar, G. (ed.) 1992. Beyond Reason: Essays on the Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Preston, J., Munévar, G. & Lamb, D. (eds.) 2000. The Worst Enemy of Science?: Essays in Memory of Paul Feyerabend. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Special Issue in Studies in HPS (M. Brown & I.J. Kidd eds). 2016. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00393681/57)

Books

• Oberheim, E. 2006. Feyerabend’s Philosophy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
• Farrell, R. 2003. Feyerabend and Scientific Values: Tightrope-Walking Rationality. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Preston, J. 1997. Feyerabend: Philosophy, Science and Society. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
• Couvalis, S. 1988. Feyerabend’s Critique of Foundationalism. Aldershot: Avebury Press.

Papers (in decreasing chronological order)

• A variety of papers that can be found on J. I. Kidd’s website: https://sites.google.com/site/dfl2ijk/.
• Barseghyan, H. & Shaw, J. 2017. “Can a Taxonomy of Stances Clarify Classic Debates About Scientific Change?” Philosophies, 2(4), 24.
• Brown, M. 2016. The Abundant World: Paul Feyerabend’s Metaphysics of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 57, 142-154.
• Shaw, J. 2017. Was Feyerabend an Anarchist? The Structure(s) of ‘Anything Goes‘. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A, 64: 11-21.
• Preston, J. 2016. Paul Feyerabend. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
• Bschir, K. 2015. Feyerabend and Popper on Theory Proliferation and Anomaly Import: On the Compatibility of Theoretical Pluralism and Critical Rationalism. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 5(1), 24-55.
• Kuby, D. 2015. Feyerabend, Paul (1924-94). In: International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edition, pp. 117-123.
• Tambolo, L. 2014. Pliability and Resistance: Feyerabendian Insights into Sophisticated Realism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 4(2), 197-213.
• Roe, S. 2009. The Attenuated Ramblings of a Madman: Feyerabend’s Anarchy Examined. Polish Journal of Philosophy, 1-20.
• Preston, C. 2005. Pluralism and Naturalism: Why the Proliferation of Theories is Good for the Mind. Philosophical Psychology, 18(6): 715-735.
• Oberheim, E. 2005. On the Historical Origins of the Contemporary Notion of Incommensurability: Paul Feyerabend’s Assault on Conceptual Conservativism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 36(2), 363-390.
• Tsou, J. Y. 2003. Reconsidering Feyerabend’s “Anarchism”. Perspectives on Science, 11(2), 208-235.
• Farrell, R. 2000. Will the Popperian Feyerabend Please Step Forward: Pluralistic, Popperian Themes in the Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 14(3), 257-266.
• Staley, K. W. 1999. Logic, Liberty, and Anarchy: Mill and Feyerabend on Scientific Method. The Social Science Journal, 36(4), 603-614.
• Lloyd, E. A. 1997. Feyerabend, Mill, and Pluralism. Philosophy of Science, 64, S396-S407.
• Lloyd, E. A. 1996. The Anachronistic Anarchist. Philosophical Studies, 81(2-3), 247-261.
• Preston, J. 1995. Frictionless Philosophy: Paul Feyerabend and Relativism. History of European Ideas, 963-968.
• Thomason, N. 1994. The Power of ARCHED Hypotheses: Feyerabend’s Galileo as a Closet Rationalist. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45(1), 255-264.
• Neto, J. 1991. Feyerabend’s Scepticism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22.4: 543-555.
• Laymon, R. 1977. Feyerabend, Brownian Motion, and the Hiddenness of Refuting Facts. Philosophy of Science 44(2), 225-247.